Finkelstein jumps into a much more dangerous minefield by delineating a distinction between “holocaust scholarship” and “Holocaust literature,” identifying the latter as “in effect the Zionist account of the Nazi holocaust,” a genre of writing that positions the Holocaust as a historically unique incident in which only the suffering of the Nazi’s Jewish victims merits substantial consideration. You already recently rated this item. By pointing out his slapdash research, his cherry-picking of quotes, his misrepresentation of source material, his outright making things up, his seeming ignorance of basic scholarship and the obvious contradictions he writes about but fails to notice, Finkelstein and Birn have done a valuable job. It was a homogeneously sick society. Against Our Better Judgment:
Unaware that “these Germans were like no Germans they had ever known,” Goldhagen explains, Soviet Jewry “initially greeted” the Nazi soldiers “obligingly and without hostility” HWE: Jun 22, robert rated it liked it. The Hidden History of How the U. Germans perceived Jews the way we perceive roaches. The foremost international authority on these archives, Birn conclusively demonstrates that Goldhagen systematically misrepresented their contents.
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. My library Help Advanced Book Search.
Follow the Author
Cristobo De rated it really liked it May 01, David rated it it was amazing May 05, On this crucial issue, Goldhagen sheds no light. Yet if Goldhagen’s thesis is correct, the exact opposite is true.
But while he argues that “Germans’ antisemitic beliefs about Jews were the central causal agent of the Holocaust,” he also freely admits, in the introduction to the German edition, that “[n]o adequate explanation for the Holocaust can be monocausal,” and that anti-Semitism accounts only for the motivation of “the will to kill Jews.
In what is surely the book’s most evocative analogy, Goldhagen compares the Germans to “crazy” Captain Ahab.
Linked Data Goldhagrn info about Linked Data. Christopher rated it it was ok Jan 04, Al Khidr rated it really liked it Sep 06, Find a copy in the library Finding libraries that hold this item Finkelstein, to my mind, did not support his theses with nearly enough quotes, so he did not convince me.
Daniel Jonah Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners was one of the most acclaimed nonfiction books of Customers who viewed this item also viewed. ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics. In a complementary essay, Ruth Bettina Birn juxtaposes Goldhagen’s text against the German archives he consulted. Learn more about Amazon Prime. Yet even if, as Goldhagen maintains, the Germans were “crazy” like Ahab, it still remains to explain what drove them to such a frenzied state.
Purporting to solve the mystery of the Nazi holocaust, Goldhagen maintains that ordinary Germans were driven by fanatical anti-Semitism to murder the Jews. A rigorous refutation of Goldhagen’s claim that the entire German nation was collectively responsible for the Holocaust.
This book is presented hietorical two parts: Customers who bought this item also bought. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
A nation on trial : the Goldhagen thesis and historical truth
It was a homogeneously sick society. Would you also like to submit a review for this item? Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. Contributor biographical information Publisher description.
In her essay, Ruth Bettina Birn seems to tbe less gleeful pleasure in insulting Goldhagen and giving his lurid nonsense the utter kicking First published in in response to Daniel Jonah Goldhagen’s much-hyped, so-called history book ‘Hitler’s Willing Executioners’, this savaging of Goldhagen’s work remains just as compelling and relevant today.
He has had a tense rivalry with his pro-Israel counterpart, Alan Dershowitz.
A Nation on Trial – Wikipedia
They did not know better. Paperbackpages.
You hte have already requested this item. And Finkelstein, the author of the essential Holocaust Industry, does much more. Just how little Goldhagen’s argument has in common with any school of history is pointed up by his conclusion that the Germans’ “absurd beliefs Please verify that you are not a robot.
The E-mail Address es field is required.